Computer Implemented Method for Compiling a Portfolio of Assets

ABSTRACT

The invention provides a computer implemented method for automatically compiling a portfolio of assets. The method comprises steps including generating a plurality of first generation portfolios of assets from a plurality of available assets, wherein each of said plurality of first generation portfolios is generated by random selection of one or more of said plurality of available assets. The method involves applying a random percentage weighting to each of said randomly selected assets, but where the sum of the random percentage weightings is arranged to equal 100%. It also involves calculating a score for each of the plurality of first generation portfolios of assets, the score for each of said plurality of first generation portfolios of assets comprising an aggregate of a plurality of different evaluation factors and ranking the plurality of first generation portfolios of assets by their respective scores. Then, one or more of said plurality of first generation portfolios of assets are selected based on their respective scores. The process is repeated through a plurality of iterations until a marginal improvement in a score for a highest ranked portfolio falls below a pre-set amount.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED TO APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No.16/970,558 filed Aug. 17, 2020 which is the U.S. National Phase of PCTapplication No. PCT/CN2019/107125 filed 20 Sep. 2019 which claimspriority to Hong Kong Patent Application No. 18112164.5 filed 20 Sep.2018 each of which is incorporated therein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a computer implemented method for compiling aportfolio of assets based on a number of constraints and evaluationfactors and, particularly, but not exclusively, to a computerimplemented method for generating, creating or modifying a portfolio offinancial assets such as stocks, bonds and/or funds with respect toquantitative and/or qualitative financial criteria.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In modern portfolio theory, the efficient frontier (or portfoliofrontier or Markowitz frontier) is an investment portfolio whichoccupies the ‘efficient’ parts of the risk-return spectrum. Formally, itis the set of portfolios which satisfies the condition that no otherportfolio exists with a higher expected return, but with the samestandard deviation of return.

A combination of assets, i.e. a portfolio, is referred to as “efficient”if it has the best possible expected generation of return for itsgeneration of risk which is represented by the standard deviation of theportfolio's return. Here, every possible combination of risky assets canbe plotted in a risk-expected return space and the collection of allsuch possible portfolios defines a region in this space. In the absenceof the opportunity to hold a risk-free asset, this region is theopportunity set (the feasible set). A positively sloped (upward-sloped)top boundary of this region is a portion of a parabola and is called the“efficient frontier.”

If a risk-free asset is also available, the opportunity set is larger,and its upper boundary, the efficient frontier, is a straight linesegment emanating from the vertical axis at the value of the risk-freeasset's return and tangent to the risky-assets-only opportunity set. Allportfolios between the risk-free asset and the tangency portfolio areportfolios composed of risk-free assets and the tangency portfolio,while all portfolios on the linear frontier above and to the right ofthe tangency portfolio are generated by borrowing at the risk-free rateand investing the proceeds into the tangency portfolio.

The efficient frontier is, however, a one point in time frontier thatdoes not account for evolving risks and return. This may lead to aportfolio being selected based on an efficient frontier calculated at apoint in time based on historical risk and return data where theportfolio is selected in respect of a chosen or agreed risk generationin the expectation of a certain generation of return. However, thegenerations of risk and return evolve over time.

There is therefore a need for an improved method of identifying the mostefficient or optimal combination of assets for a portfolio that takesaccount of evolving constraints and evaluation factors such as risks andreturns.

OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

An objective of the invention is to mitigate or obviate to some degreeone or more problems associated with known methods of identifyingcombinations of assets for a portfolio, such as the large computationaleffort required, the risk of finding a local optimum only, or not beingable to identify any goal criteria.

One skilled in the art will derive from the following description otherobjects of the invention. Therefore, the foregoing statements of objectare not exhaustive and serve merely to illustrate some of the manyobjects of the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention particularly, but not exclusively, seeks improvement ofthe quality of a portfolio of financial assets such as stocks, bonds,funds, structured products or even insurances with respect toquantitative and/or qualitative financial criteria, using the concept ofa genetic algorithm combined with an evolutionary iterative process ofportfolio modification/alteration and subsequent evaluation of thequality of the financial portfolio via a scoring assessment method, i.e.a “fitness” scoring or evaluation method.

It is envisaged that the invention will help to derive an investmentportfolio proposal for financial investors based on a number of inputsand constraints. Asset/portfolio rebalancing recommendations emanatingfrom this invention could be used to propose a portfolio of financialassets for investors looking to invest in various financial investmentassets or re-assessing their current distributions in financial assets.The scope of the evaluation of this invention encompasses financialwealth management assets (“financial assets”) including Mutual Funds(“MF”), bonds, structured notes, insurance, exchange-traded assets(typically stocks, Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), etc.), and cash assets(e.g. deposits, savings/checking accounts).

It should be noted, however, that the method of the invention can beapplied to other complex situations where a plurality of availableassets need to be combined in an efficient or optimum manner to addressa situation exhibiting a number of constraints and evaluation factors.One such situation is disaster relief where a combination of humanresources, medical equipment, medicines, rescue equipment,accommodation, logistical support need to determined and combined havingregard to constraints such as funds available, personnel available,modes of transport, regulatory requirements, timing, etc. With a definedset of constraints/evaluation factors, the method of the inventionenables the evolution of an optimum or at least an improved disasterrelief package based on an initial human generated proposal, although insome instances an empty proposal could comprise the initial proposal.Consequently, the invention is also applicable to the evaluation of apopulation of solutions including technical and/or logistical solutionsin order to evolve to an improved or optimal solution.

In a first main aspect, the invention provides a computer implementedmethod for automatically compiling a portfolio of assets. The methodcomprises the steps including generating a plurality of first generationportfolios of assets from a plurality of available assets, wherein eachof said plurality of first generation portfolios is generated by randomselection of one or more of said plurality of available assets. Themethod involves applying a random percentage weighting to each of saidrandomly selected assets for each generated portfolio, but where the sumof the random percentage weightings is arranged to equal 100%. It alsoinvolves calculating a score for each of the plurality of firstgeneration portfolios of assets, the score for each of said plurality offirst generation portfolios of assets preferably comprising a fitnessscore based on an aggregate of a plurality of different evaluationfactors and then ranking the plurality of first generation portfolios ofassets by their respective scores. Subsequently, one or more of saidplurality of first generation portfolios of assets are selected based ontheir respective scores. The process is repeated through a plurality ofiterations until a marginal improvement in a score for a highest rankedportfolio falls below a pre-set, selected or calculated amount. Thehighest ranked portfolio satisfying this condition may then be selectedfor implementation. The process can also be repeated periodically usingan implemented highest ranked portfolio as an initial portfolio ofassets, i.e. as a ‘starting’ or ‘seed’ portfolio.

In a second main aspect, the invention provides a non-transitorycomputer readable medium storing machine readable code which, whenexecuted by a processor, causes an electronic processing device toimplement the steps of the first main aspect.

In a third main aspect, the invention provides a computer based systemfor automatically compiling a portfolio of assets, the system comprisinga computer readable medium storing machine readable code and a processorconfigured to execute said machine readable code to implement the stepsof the first main aspect.

The summary of the invention does not necessarily disclose all thefeatures essential for defining the invention; the invention may residein a sub-combination of the disclosed features.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and further features of the present invention will beapparent from the following description of preferred embodiments whichare provided by way of example only in connection with the accompanyingfigures, of which:

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a first embodiment of a computer based systemimplementing the method of the invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagram of a second embodiment of a computer based systemimplementing the method of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a diagram of a third embodiment of a computer base systemimplementing the method of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a representation of a mathematical solution space for twofitness factors to be evaluated;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating at a general level the methodof the invention;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating a method of generating firstand next generations of portfolios in accordance with the invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating in more detail the method ofFIG. 6 ;

FIG. 8 comprises a table illustrating the calculation of fitness scores;

FIG. 9 is a schematic illustration of the ranking of portfolios by theirrespective fitness scores;

FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating the generation of childportfolios from parent portfolios;

FIG. 11 is a schematic illustration of a mutation selection and mutationprocess; and

FIG. 12 is a schematic illustration of the iterative process of theinvention.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following description is of preferred embodiments by way of exampleonly and without limitation to the combination of features necessary forcarrying the invention into effect.

Reference in this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment”means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic describedin connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodimentof the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” invarious places in the specification are not necessarily all referring tothe same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodimentsmutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features aredescribed which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others.Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirementsfor some embodiments but not other embodiments.

It should be understood that the elements shown in the FIGS, may beimplemented in various forms of hardware, software or combinationsthereof. Preferably, these elements are implemented in a combination ofhardware and software on one or more appropriately programmedgeneral-purpose devices, which may include a processor, memory andinput/output interfaces.

The functions of the various elements shown in the figures may beprovided through the use of dedicated hardware as well as hardwarecapable of executing software in association with appropriate software.When provided by a processor, the functions may be provided by a singlededicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality ofindividual processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicituse of the term “processor” or “controller” should not be construed torefer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software, and mayimplicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (“DSP”)hardware, read-only memory (“ROM”) for storing software, random accessmemory (“RAM”), and non-volatile storage.

In the claims hereof, any element expressed as a means for performing aspecified function is intended to encompass any way of performing thatfunction including, for example, a) a combination of circuit elementsthat performs that function or b) software in any form, including,therefore, firmware, microcode or the like, combined with appropriatecircuitry for executing that software to perform the function. Theinvention as defined by such claims resides in the fact that thefunctionalities provided by the various recited means are combined andbrought together in the manner which the claims call for. It is thusregarded that any means that can provide those functionalities areequivalent to those shown herein.

In general, the invention comprises a computer-based system and processwhich uses a genetic optimization algorithm to allow construction ofportfolios of assets, particularly portfolios of financial assets, basedon a machine-based mathematical optimization process which uses theconcept of a genetic algorithm with evaluation of the portfolio using amathematical “fitness” function. The invention seeks to find theportfolio with the highest “fitness” score. The initial input can be anexisting or already implemented portfolio of financial assets, whichwill subsequently get optimized or at least improved, or a portfolioentirely comprising of cash, or a mix of both.

In the context of the invention, “fitness” may be calculated as anaggregate, preferably a weighted aggregate, of a number of fitnessfactors explained more fully below. The factors may comprisemathematical functions which may each be measures of a differentcriterion of the evaluated portfolio. The weights of the factors may bedetermined based on their respective contexts. Each of these factors maybe a parameter of the aggregate fitness score and therefore there may betrade-offs between them.

The genetic algorithm may comprise a method for solving both constrainedand unconstrained optimization problems and may be based on naturalselection, the process that drives biological evolution. The geneticalgorithm preferably is arranged to repeatedly modify a population ofindividual solutions, referred to herein as portfolios. At each step,the genetic algorithm is arranged to select individual portfolios withhigher fitness within the current population to be set as parents anduses them to produce the offspring, e.g. child portfolios, for thengenerating the next generation of portfolios. Over successivegenerations, the population “evolves” toward an improved or optimalsolution.

For portfolio construction, the algorithm applies three main principlesof evolution, namely “crossover”, “mutation” and “selection”. One of thekey assumptions is that this heuristic approach will be able to find theglobal optimum within the solution space/surface despite a potentiallyhuge amount of potential solutions. The solution space is ann-dimensional space with n being the number of fitness factors to beevaluated. Within that space, certain constraints can be imposed tocater for restrictions/limitations for investment choices or indeed forany choices relating to a complex situation.

Portfolios are evaluated based on their fitness according topredetermined fitness criteria. The optimization process can take aninitial input portfolio, which might comprise an investor's currentportfolio, as a starting point, and evaluate its fitness. A geneticoptimization process is used to try to find an alternative financialportfolio with a better or even optimum fitness score. In general, forthe genetic optimization process, a larger population and a larger setof portfolio generations (next portfolio generations) should provide abetter result, i.e. this should increase the likelihood of finding abetter solution or even the global optimum in the solution space, but atthe cost of some additional computational calculation/run-time for thealgorithm. The process of mutation itself increases the variation ofresults from generation to generation. Depending on the surface of thesolution space, this is more likely to bring the results closer to theoptimal solution where the solution surface is very unsteady (i.e. hasan increasing likelihood to move away from a local optimum, which is notthe global optimum), but can also lead to more unstable results wherethe solution space/surface is very smooth/steady.

The fitness score itself is preferably a weighted sum of the scores ofthe individual factors and hence depends on the weights set for each ofthose factors. A larger weight for a particular factor will typicallyput more emphasis on finding a solution that meets this particularfitness criterion, i.e. has a higher score for that particular factor.Some factors can have an offsetting character (e.g. optimizing forkeeping as many existing assets as possible vs. optimizing to have asmany ‘preferred’ assets as possible), and some factors may have amutually amplifying character in certain scenarios. However, in general,the factors are designed in a fashion that makes them mostly independentand uncorrelated. That means, the output should be stable from aregression point of view when the input is changed marginally.

Referring to FIG. 1 , shown by way of example only is a schematicdiagram of a first embodiment of a computer based system 20 in which themethod of the invention can be applied. The computer based system 20comprises a plurality of client devices 12 connected by a communicationsnetwork such as the internet 24 to a server system 26. The clientdevices 12 may be directly connected to the server system 26 or mayconnect through an intermediary system 28 such as a financial advisorsystem or broker system. It will be understood that a client device 12is not limited to a device operated by an individual investor, but maybe representative of an institutional investor, an advisor investor orany other third party wishing to invest in a portfolio or portfolios ofassets.

It will be appreciated that, whilst the embodiments described hereincomprise computer based systems for managing financial assets, theconcepts of the invention could be applied to the management of anyassets whose use or implementation are subject to a plurality ofconstraints and/or evaluation factors or any population of solutionswhose use or implementation are subject to a plurality of constraintsand/or evaluation factors. Thus, the concepts of the invention could beimplemented in computer based systems to optimize insurance quotations,to optimize cash-flow management and/or projections, to optimize apopulation of technical solutions to a technical problem such as acomplex engineering problem. By way of example, one such engineeringproblem would be optimizing management of plasma generation and/or flowin a fusion reactor chamber.

The server system 26 is itself connected to one or more dealer or brokersystems 30 through which financial assets can be purchased from and soldto financial institutions 22 or the like. The server system 26 comprisesa processor 34, at least one memory 36 storing machine readableinstructions which, when implemented by the processor 34, configures theprocessor 34 to implement the methods of the invention as hereindescribed and to generate a graphical user interface accessible to theclient devices 12. The server system 36 also includes a system database38 for storing client account data, fund asset data, transaction dataand all other data necessary for functioning of the server system 36.The system database 38 may be embodied in the server 36 or comprise aseparate device connected to the server 36 via a communications networksuch as the internet 24. In addition, the system of FIG. 1 may includeone or more market information databases 40 for providing real time ornear real time asset valuation data to the server system 26, the advisorand broker systems 28, 30 and the client devices 12. In someembodiments, the broker systems 30 provide the real time or near realtime asset valuation data.

The processor 34 of the system 26 is configured to receive input datafrom the plurality of client devices 12 and to receive real time or nearreal time financial data from the system database 38.

The client devices 12 may comprise desktop computers, laptops, tabletcomputers, smart phones or any other suitable client devices 12providing access to the server system's graphical user interface bywhich a client (investor) may manage their financial investments. Thesystem 26 can provide a suitable graphical interface to any suitablyenabled electronic processing device to enable said client device 12 tointeract with the system 26 over a suitable communications network 24.The system 26 preferably communicates through a computer network such asthe internet 24, but, in some embodiments, private communicationsnetworks may be utilised.

The processor 34 is preferably configured to automatically identify acombination of assets comprising a portfolio for a client device 12based on a set of parameters and/or constraints. The parameters and/orconstraints may be input by the client device 12. Parameters and/orconstraints may include any one or more of maximum single investmentweight, maximum asset class weight, currency weights, productrisk-ratings, investor risk generation, currency type, maximum totalinvestment amount, minimum investment amount for each product, amongothers. Parameters, e.g. evaluation factors, for determining a fitnessscore for a portfolio may include any one or more of Asset ClassAllocation Factor (ACA), Asset Correlation Factor (AC), Preferred AssetFactor (PA), Reuse of Existing Assets Factor (REA), PortfolioPerformance Factor (PP), Portfolio Volatility Factor (PV), PreferredCurrency Factor (PC), FX Minimization Factor (FXM), InvestmentPreference Factor (IP), and Sharpe Ratio Factor (SR) among others. Onepurpose of the method of the invention is to find the most optimalportfolio (combination of financial assets) within said set ofparameters and/or constraints.

The processor 34 is may be configured to automatically identify acombination of assets comprising a portfolio for a client device 12 bydetermining an initial portfolio combination of assets based onhistorical risk and return data or by using an existing portfolio.

Referring to FIG. 2 , shown is a schematic diagram of a secondembodiment of a computer based system 100 in which the method of theinvention may be implemented. The computer based system 100 comprises avirtual fund system 100 in which the method of the invention can beapplied in addition to other asset management functions. By virtual fundis meant that the fund operates in a manner which mimics that of amutual fund in pooling investors' money to trade financial assets inpursuit of an investment strategy, but without the asset ownershipconstraints of a mutual fund. The virtual fund system 100 or ‘vFund’system 100 as hereinafter referred to comprises a plurality of clientdevices 112 connected by a communications network such as the internet114 to the vFund server system 116. The client devices 112 may bedirectly connected to the server system 116 or may connect through anintermediary system 118 such as a financial advisor system or brokersystem. It will be understood that a client device 112 is not limited toa device operated by an individual investor, but may be representativeof an institutional investor, an advisor investor or any other thirdparty wishing to invest in the vFund 101.

The vFund server system 116 is itself connected to one or more dealer orbroker systems 120 through which the vFund 101 purchases and sellfinancial assets from and to financial institutions 112 or the like. Thefinancial assets managed by the vFund 101 are owned by the investors inproportion to their invested amounts. The vFund server system 116comprises a processor 124, at least one memory 126 storing machinereadable instructions which, when implemented by the processor 124,configures the processor 124 to implement the methods of the inventionas herein described and to generate a graphical user interfaceaccessible to the client devices 112. The vFund server system 116 alsoincludes a system database 128 for storing client account data, fundasset data, transaction data and all other data necessary forfunctioning of the vFund server system 116. The system database 128 maybe embodied in the server 116 or comprise a separate device connected tothe server 116 via a communications network such as the internet 114. Inaddition, the system of FIG. 2 may include one or more marketinformation databases 130 for providing real time or near real timeasset valuation data to the vFund server system 116 and the advisor andbroker systems 118, 120. In some embodiments, the broker systems 120provide the real time or near real time asset valuation data.

In the embodiment of FIG. 2 , the vFund server system 116 manages asingle virtual financial assets fund (vFund) 101 on behalf of aplurality of investors using client devices 112 whereas in theembodiment of FIG. 3 , as hereinafter described, the server systemmanages a plurality of vFunds. The processor 124 of the system isconfigured to receive input data from the plurality of client devices112 and to receive real time or near real time data defining currentfinancial asset holdings in a portfolio of the vFund 101 from the systemdatabase 128. In response, the processor 124 adjusts the balance offinancial asset holdings in the vFund portfolio in response to thereceived client device input data. It then generates for each clientdevice 112 data updating each client's investor account with the fund toreplicate in said client account the same adjusted asset holdings as nowheld in said fund proportionally in accordance with each client'sinvestment amount. The generated data for an investor may immediately besent to said investor's client device 112 or sent when the inventor nextsigns into the system 116. In any event, the data defines which assetsmanaged by the fund 101 are owned by that investor with the technicalbenefits as hereinbefore and hereinafter described.

The client devices 112 may comprise desktop computers, laptops, tabletcomputers, smart phones or any other suitable client devices 112providing access to the vFund system's graphical user interface by whicha client (investor) may manage their financial investments. The system116 can provide a suitable graphical interface to any suitably enabledelectronic processing device to enable said client device 112 tointeract with the system 116 over a suitable communications network 114.The system 116 preferably communicates through a computer network suchas the internet 114, but in some embodiments private communicationsnetworks are utilised.

More specifically, the processor 124 is preferably configured to receivereal time or near real time market data defining current values for eachof the financial asset holdings in the vFund portfolio and otherfinancial assets in the market. As such, the processor 124 may beconfigured to process said received client input data, said datadefining current financial asset holdings in the vFund portfolio, andsaid market data to generate data defining: (i) sell orders for assetsto be sold and the value expected when such orders are executed based onthe received market data; and (ii) purchase orders for assets to bepurchased and the expected cost based on the received market data. Theprocessor 124 may be configured to submit said sell orders to a brokersystem 120 or the like for execution and thereafter to receive data fromthe broker system 120 on value realized for executed sell orders. Theprocessor 124 may also be configured to receive new real time or nearreal time market data from the broker system 120 or a market informationdatabase 130 and, in response, to generate data defining a differencebetween the value expected from the execution of sell orders and thevalue actually realized. The generation of value difference data mayinvolve foreign exchange rate data.

The processor 124 may be configured to use the value difference data andthe new market data to adjust the pre-calculated purchase orders andthereafter to submit the adjusted purchase orders to the broker system120 for execution. In response, the processor 124 may be configured toreceive data defining newly purchased assets from the broker system 120.The processor 124 is configured to combine data defining said newlypurchased assets with data defining assets remaining in said fundportfolio to update the portfolio holdings.

The processor 124 is configured to then generate data for each clientdevice to update each client's investor account to replicate in saidclient account the same updated asset holdings as held in said updatedfund portfolio proportionally in accordance with each client'sinvestment amount. As such, the financial assets are managed by thefund's investment managers, but the actual assets are directly owned bythe investors in proportion to their invested amounts. This creates adirect ownership link between the client investors and the financialassets allotted to their respective client portfolios. The technicalbenefit is that the valuation at any moment in time of an investor'sclient portfolio is directly linked to the market values of the assetsowned by said investor and furthermore the investor is able to accessreal time or near real time valuation data through any of a number ofmarket data sources to obtain valuations of said assets. Thus, incontrast to a mutual fund where values are tied to an infrequentlycalculated NAV, the arrangement of the invention provides a virtual fundbased investment vehicle, but with direct ownership by investors of thefund's managed assets and access to real time or near real tinevaluation data.

A further technical benefit is that investors can also access real timeor near real time data displaying the composition of the assets managedby the virtual fund.

A yet further technical benefit is that the virtual fund investmentmanagers can much more easily and with less computational complexitycentrally determine the overall valuations of the fund's managedholdings again based on real time data.

In the system of FIG. 2 , client devices 112 may provide inputs to beprocessed by the processor 124 to implement the method of the invention.

Referring to FIG. 3 , shown is a schematic diagram of a third embodimentof a computer based system 200 in which the method of the invention maybe applied. The computer based system comprises another embodiment of avirtual fund system 200. The ‘vFund’ system 200 of this embodiment isgenerally the same as that of FIG. 2 save for the aspect that the‘vFund’ system 200 comprises a plurality of vFunds 200 a to 200 n. Asbefore, a plurality of client devices 212 is connected by acommunications network such as the internet 214 to the vFund serversystem 216. The client devices 212 may be directly connected to theserver system 216 or may connect through an intermediary system 218 suchas a financial advisor system or broker system. The vFund server system216 is itself again connected to one or more dealer or broker systems220 through which the vFund managers purchase and sell financial assetsfrom and to financial institutions 222 or the like for the plurality ofvFunds. The vFund server system 216 comprises a processor 224, at leastone memory 226 storing machine readable instructions which, whenimplemented by the processor 224, configures the processor 224 toimplement the methods of the invention as herein described and togenerate a graphical user interface accessible to the client devices212. The vFund server system 216 also includes a system database 228 forstoring client account data, fund asset data, transaction data and allother data necessary for functioning of the vFund server system 216. Inaddition, the system of FIG. 3 may include one or more marketinformation databases 230 for providing real time or near real timeasset valuation data to the vFund server system 216 and the advisor andbroker systems 218, 220.

In the embodiment of FIG. 3 , the vFund server system 216 manages aplurality of vFunds 200 a to 200 n on behalf of a plurality of investorsusing client devices 212. The processor 224 of the system is configuredto receive input data from the plurality of client devices 212 and toreceive real time or near real time data defining current financialasset holdings in the plurality of portfolios of the vFund 200 a to 200n from the system database 228. In response, the processor 224 adjuststhe balance of financial asset holdings in the plurality of portfoliosin response to the received client device input data. It then generatesfor each client device 212 data updating each client's investor accountwith the fund to replicate in said client account the same adjustedasset holdings as now managed by said plurality of vFund portfoliosproportionally in accordance with each client's investment amount(s).

More specifically, the processor 224 is preferably configured to receivereal time or near real time market data defining current values for eachof the financial asset holdings in the plurality of fund portfolios andpreferably other financial assets in the market. The processor 224 isconfigured to process said received client input data, said datadefining current financial asset holdings managed by the plurality ofvFund portfolios, and said market data to generate data defining: (i)sell orders for assets to be sold and the value expected when suchorders are executed based on the received market data; and (ii) purchaseorders for assets to be purchased and the expected cost based on thereceived market data. The processor 224 is configured to submit saidsell orders to a broker system 220 for execution and thereafter toreceive data from the broker system 220 on value realized for executedsell orders. The processor 224 may also be configured to receive newreal time or near real time market data from the broker system 120 or amarket information database 230. The processor 224 defines a differencebetween the value expected from the execution of sell orders and thevalue actually realized. The processor 224 is configured to use thevalue difference data and any new market data to adjust thepre-calculated purchase orders and thereafter to submit the adjustedpurchase orders to the broker system for execution. In response, theprocessor 224 receives data defining newly purchased assets from thebroker system 220 and determines from said received data which parts ofthe newly purchased assets are to be assigned to which of the pluralityof the vFund portfolios.

The processor 224 is configured to then allocate said parts of the newlypurchased assets to the respective vFund portfolios and to combine datadefining said parts of the newly purchased assets with data definingassets remaining in said vFund portfolios to update the portfolioholdings. The processor 224 is configured to then generate data for eachclient device to update each client's investor account to replicate insaid client account the same updated asset holdings as managed by saidplurality of vFund portfolios proportionally in accordance with eachclient's investment amounts in said vFunds.

In the system of FIG. 3 , client devices 212 may provide inputs to beprocessed by the processor 224 to implement the method of the invention.

One technical problem addressed by the embodiments of the invention ishow to give client investors in a fund type investment vehicle real timeaccess to valuation data of their invested amounts. The technicalsolution is to generate data for each client investor to update eachclient's investor account to replicate in said client account the sameupdated asset holdings as managed by said plurality of vFund portfoliosproportionally in accordance with each client's investment amounts. Thiscreates a direct ownership link by the client investors of the financialassets managed by the vFunds with the ability to thereby provide accessto real time or near real time valuation data.

Once connected to the system, all the participants benefit from theenhanced connectivity provided thereby. A client can get up to dateinformation about all the investments in any account and can have accessto high quality managers to whom they normally would not have access. Anadvisor can monetize accounts through portfolio customization and thevFund system, thus charging an asset under management ‘AUM’ based fee. Afinancial intermediary can monetize its in-house research and streamlineproduct distribution based on centralized risk models. Other financialinstitutions such as banks can sell additional financial relatedproducts to all linked to the system (e.g. credit cards, mortgages,insurance). An investment manager in a remote part of the world candevelop a new client base in regions previously not possible due tophysical constraints and/or regulatory hurdles.

FIG. 4 provides a schematic representation by way of example of amathematical solution space 300 for two fitness factors to be evaluated.The solution space 300 is limited by a number of constraints, hence thefeasible solution region 300A bounded by line 310 is smaller than thetotal area of the solution space 300. In this example, Portfolio Aconstitutes the portfolio occupying the global maximum which comprisesthe optimal solution having the best fitness score. In contrast,Portfolio B occupies a local maximum which may appear to some observerswith a limited view of the solution space 300 as comprising an optimumsolution when, in fact, it comprises an inferior solution, i.e. asolution not having the highest fitness score in the feasible solutionregion 300A. Portfolio C is a non-optimal solution within the feasiblesolution region 300A whereas Portfolio D lies outside the feasiblesolution region 300A and thus is not a valid solution and would bediscarded from any consideration.

FIG. 5 provides a schematic representation of the general process of theinvention illustrating the inputs 400, the optimization process 410 andthe outputs 420. The inputs may be inputted by a user on a client device12, 112, 212 (FIGS. 1 to 3 ). The inputs may include session relatedinformation 401 such as the user's unique identifier (ID), a selectedcurrency for the session, a selected type of risk assessment, and theuser's country of residence among other things. User or customerinformation 402 may include the user's risk profile, the user'spreferred currency, a category of concentration, a concentration limit,a type of recommendation, the user's references for growth and/orincome. A further input may comprise the user's current portfolioinformation 403 including the user's investment goals such as risklevel, currency, price, FX conversion rate, current amount and frozenamount in asset currency, rate of return (ROI), cash risk class, etc.Consequently, a plurality of constraints can be derived from the userinformation 402 and the current portfolio information 403. Further inputinformation may comprise fitness parameter information 404 and fitnessparameter weights 405. Eligible product information 405 may also beinputted.

The optimization process 410 comprises in brief a first step 411 ofrandomly generating a population of individuals or portfolios, a secondstep 412 of applying a fitness test to each generated portfolio, a thirdstep 413 of keeping only a subset of the generated portfolios comprisingthose with the upper fitness scores, a fourth step 414 of using thesubset of the generated portfolios comprising those with the upperfitness scores to ‘reproduce’, i.e. to generate a next generation ofportfolios, and a fifth step 415 which is to repeat the first to fourthsteps a plurality of times until a marginal improvement of a highestranking next generation portfolio by fitness score falls to below apreset value or amount. The highest ranking next generation portfoliomay then be selected as the output 420 for implementation as the user'snew rebalanced portfolio where the output data may comprise sessionrelated information 421 comprising the user's ID and rebalance status,success scenario information 422 comprising such things as the goal ID,the Sharpe ratios, ROIs, fitness core, fitness function names andcorresponding values for current and rebalanced portfolios, and totalportfolio. The output 420 may include information 423 defining theuser's rebalanced portfolio. Where appropriate, failure scenario outputinformation 424 may also be provided.

FIG. 6 illustrates a method 500 for generating a first generation ofportfolios. Preferably, the method commences with an initial portfolioof assets 501, although this is not essential. The initial portfolio ofassets 501 may comprise a user's or fund's existing portfolio.Alternatively, it may comprise an empty portfolio or a cash onlyportfolio or a combination of cash and assets. Cash can be treated as anasset. In FIG. 6 , the initial portfolio of assets 501 comprises threeassets A, B and C which each have a respective percentage weightingwithin the portfolio 501. A has a weighting of 57%, B a weighting of 12%and C a weighting of 31%. One of said assets A, B or C may comprisecash. In any event, the sum of the percentage weightings of the threeassets A, B and C equals 100%.

The assets of the initial portfolio 501 are considered as forming all orpart of a plurality of available assets 503 for generating the firstgeneration of portfolios. Included in the plurality of available assets503 may be a number of other eligible assets 502 which can be used togenerate the first generation of portfolios 506. In this example, theother eligible assets 502 comprise assets X, Y and Z. The plurality ofavailable assets 503 thus comprises the list of assets that could beincluded in the generated first generation of portfolios 506 by randomselection from said list 503 and by random assignment of weightingswithin set limits.

In the plurality of available assets 503, each of assets A, B and C arelimited to a maximum of their original percentage weightings in theinitial portfolio 501, although lower or higher maximum limits could beapplied. Also, in the plurality of available assets 503, each of theother eligible assets 502 X, Y and Z are limited to a maximum percentageweighting of 100%, although lower maximum limits could be applied tothese assets.

The method 500 generates a plurality of first generation portfolios 505from the plurality of available assets 503. Each first generationportfolio 505 is generated by the steps 504 of randomly selecting one ormore of said plurality of available assets 503 and applying a randompercentage weighting to each of said randomly selected assets, but wherethe sum of the random percentage weightings is arranged to equal 100%.The randomly selected percentage weighting for any asset randomlyselected from the plurality of available assets 503 is randomly selectedfrom a continuous range of values preferably bounded at its lower end byzero and preferably bounded at its upper end by the maximum limit forthat asset in the plurality of available assets 503. However, differentlower and upper limits for the continuous range of percentage weightingsfor any of the assets may be applied. By way of example, FIG. 6 shows afirst one 505 of the randomly generated first generation portfolioswhich comprises different weightings of assets A, B, X and Y. Steps 504are repeated to randomly generate a predetermined number of firstgeneration portfolios 505.

FIG. 7 illustrates the method 500 of FIG. 6 in more detail with respectto the random selection of assets A and B by way of example. The method500 starts with an empty first generation portfolio 505. A first asset507 is randomly selected from the list of available assets 503. In thisinstance, the first randomly selected asset 507 is A. A randomlyselected percentage weighting is applied to asset A where said randomlyselected weighting is selected from a continuous range having a lowerlimit of zero and a maximum limit of 57%. In this instance, the randomlyselected weighting for the first asset 507 (A) within its permittedrange is 36.7%. Despite the fact that asset A comprises the firstrandomly selected asset, it is not withdrawn for future random selectionfrom the list of available assets 503. However, as asset A has a maximumavailable weighting of 57% and the randomly selected weighting alreadyapplied to it is 36.7%, the maximum percentage weighting value allowedfor it in the list of available assets 503 is reduced to 20.3% therebypreventing any possibility that further random selections of asset Acould increase its percentage weighting in the first generationportfolio 506 above 57%. The list of available assets 503 is thereforemodified as shown in FIG. 7 at 503A.

As the first randomly selected asset 507 for the first generationportfolio 506 comprised asset A which cannot, through one or more randomselections, exceed 57% of the first generation portfolio 505, it isnecessary to continue the process of random selection of one or moreother assets from the list of available assets 503A. In contrast, if,for example, the first randomly selected asset from list 503 had beenasset X then it is possible that this asset could have received arandomly selected weighting of 100% thereby completing generation ofthis particular one of the first generation portfolios 505. Asillustrated in FIG. 7 , asset B is the second randomly selected asset508 from list 503A. In this instance, the maximum weighting availablefor asset B is 12% in the list of available assets 503A, but, in thisexample, the randomly selected weighting for the second selected asset508 (B) is 4.6%. Consequently, the list of available assets 503A ismodified to provide list 503B where the weighting for asset B is nowlimited to a maximum value of 7.4%.

In a next random selection of an asset from the list 503B, asset A isagain selected and this time randomly assigned a weighting of 9.3%.Consequently, the list of available assets 503B is modified to providelist 503C where the weighting for asset A is now limited to a maximumvalue of 11%. The portfolio 505 now has 46% of asset A and 4.6% of assetB so further random selections of assets are required from modified list503C. The process of random selection of assets and random assignment ofweightings within permitted limits continues until portfolio 505 isfilled as illustrated in FIG. 7 at 505A.

In a preferred embodiment, the number of first generation portfolios 505to be generated is preferably 256 and it is preferred that this numberis repeated in each next generation of portfolios, although it will beunderstood that other predetermined numbers of portfolios per generationmay be selected. In some embodiments, the initial portfolio such as auser's or fund's existing portfolio comprises the first of the firstgeneration of portfolios 505. The selection of a predetermined number ofportfolios for each generation of portfolios may be determined through aqualitative and/or quantitative assessment by experienced personnel.

In the case where the list of available assets comprises n assets fromthe initial portfolio and a list of other eligible assets, it ispossible to generate N polarized portfolios from each of the n assets. Apolarized portfolio is created by filling it up with only one eligibleasset with its corresponding maximum weight. If the portfolio is notcompletely filled, other assets from the available asset list will beused to fill it with random processes until the portfolio is completelyfilled.

Once the first generation of portfolios 505 is generated, a fitnessscore is calculated for each of the plurality of first generationportfolios 505 where the score for each first generation portfolio 505comprises an aggregate of a plurality of different evaluation factors.Preferably, the aggregate is a weighted aggregate of the plurality ofdifferent evaluation factors. An example of the calculation of fitnessscores is illustrated in FIG. 8 .

FIG. 9 illustrates how the first generation of 256 portfolios 505 can beranked according to their fitness scores and, in the example of FIG. 9 ,it can be seen that the bottom 50% of said first generation of 256portfolios are discarded whilst the top 50% are selected as parentportfolios for the generation of a plurality of child portfolios.

FIG. 10 illustrates the method 600 of how the 128 first generationportfolios selected as parent portfolios 601 can be utilized to generatepreferably an equal number (128) of child portfolios 602. Each childportfolio 602 is generated by two parent portfolios 601 in the rankedlist 603 of 128 selected parent portfolios. Preferably, each childportfolio 602 is generated by two adjacent parent portfolios 601 in theranked list 603. For example, the 1st parent portfolio is combined withthe second parent portfolio, i.e. the next adjacent parent portfolio inthe ranked list 603, and the second parent portfolio is combined withthe third parent portfolio 601 and so on. However, to generate the 128thchild portfolio, it is preferred to combine the 128th parent portfoliowith a newly generated parent portfolio, although in some embodimentsthe 128th child portfolio can be generated from the 128th parentportfolio combined with a randomly selected one of the 1st to 126thparent portfolios.

Taking by way of example the generation of the first child portfolio 602from the first parent portfolio 601A and the second parent portfolio602A, it can be seen that the assets of the first and second parentportfolios 601A, 601B are combined to create a list of available assets604 for generation of the first child portfolio 602 by random selectionof assets from said list 604 and random selection of weight values fromthe permitted weight ranges for said assets in said list 604 in a mannergenerally similar to that illustrated in FIG. 7 . By repeating themethod 600, the first 127 child portfolios 602 can be generated. Thelast, i.e. the 128th, child portfolio 602 is generated by the samerandom selection of assets and weight values, but through a combinationof the 128th parent portfolio 601 with a newly generated parentportfolio or a random selection of one of the 1st to 126th parentportfolios 601.

All 128 parent portfolios 601 and all 128 child portfolios 602 togethernow comprise a next generation set of portfolios 710.

Some of the next generation set of portfolios 710 may be selected toundergo a mutation process whereby, for a selected portfolio in the set,at least one asset of said portfolio is randomly selected and all or arandomly selected percentage weighted portion of said randomly selectedasset is replaced by another asset randomly selected from a union ofassets comprising a group of all of assets of existing portfolios and/ora group of other eligible assets. The portfolios from the nextgeneration set of portfolios 710 selected to undergo the mutationprocess may be selected by assigning each of said next portfolios of thenext generation set of portfolios 710 with a binary value according to apre-set mutation rate, where the assigned binary value determineswhether a portfolio is selected for the mutation process or not. Theprobability of being assigned the binary value for selection formutation would equal the pre-set mutation rate. All 128 parentportfolios 601 and all 128 child portfolios comprising the nextgeneration set of portfolios 710 may be subjected to the mutationselection process.

The mutation selection 700 and mutation process 750 are each illustratedby FIG. 11 where, in the mutation selection process 700, each of the 256next generation portfolios 710 is assigned a binary value of “0” or “1”where “0” indicates that said portfolio is not to be subjected to themutation process 750 and a “1” indicates that the selected portfoliowill be mutated as described below. The probability of a next generationportfolio 710 being assigned a “1” equals the pre-set mutation rate,which may be selected by skilled personnel or calculated.

In the mutation process 750, for a selected next generation portfolio710, a list of available assets 751 is formed preferably comprising theassets of said selected next generation portfolio 710 and/or the othereligible assets X, Y, Z. The mutation process 750 comprises the step ofrandomly selecting an asset from the assets of said selected nextgeneration portfolio 710. In this instance, asset A from the selectedportfolio 710 is randomly selected. In a next step of the mutationprocess 750, a randomly determined portion of said randomly selectedasset A is selected to be replaced by a randomly selected asset from thelist of available assets 751. In this instance, asset X is selected fromlist 751 to replace the portion of asset A to thereby form a mutatedversion 752 of the selected portfolio 710 where the mutated version 752comprises a combination of assets A, B, C and X rather than only assetsA, B and C prior to mutation.

The next generation of portfolios 710 now includes some mutatedportfolios 752. The resulting next generation of portfolios 710, 752 isnow itself subject to the fitness assessment and selection processes forcreating yet another next generation of portfolios by the methodhereinbefore described. This involves calculating a fitness score foreach of the next generation of portfolios 710, 752, ranking said nextgeneration of portfolios 710, 752 by their respective fitness scores,selecting a subset of said next generation of portfolios 710, 752 basedon their respective scores as next generation parent portfolios, andthen using said next generation parent portfolios to generate aplurality of next generation child portfolios. Some of said nextgeneration parent portfolios and next generation child portfolios may beselected to undergo the mutation process to thereby arrive at yetanother next generation of portfolios.

As illustrated in FIG. 12 , the steps of ranking, selecting, generating,and calculating a score for each next generation of portfolios isrepeated for a plurality of times, e.g. 100, until a marginalimprovement in a fitness score calculated for a highest rankingportfolio is less than a predetermined amount preferably over a latterpre-set number, e.g. 10, of said 100 or so iterations. Once this pointis reached, the highest ranking portfolio may be selected forimplementation.

Preferably, “fitness”, i.e. the aggregate fitness score, is calculatedas the weighted sum of a number of factors which may comprisemathematically determined formulas based on certain criteria of thegiven financial assets as set out further below. The correspondingweights can be defined independently for every optimization request orcan be set universally. Every factor will make its own contribution tothe aggregate fitness score, by looking into a certain aspect/financialquality criterion for the given assets. One factor may have anoff-setting or amplifying character with another factor, but in general,the factors are designed to be based on independent/uncorrelatedattributes of the assets. The factors are applied on the financialportfolio which is getting optimized, and can take into account allassets within the financial portfolio, including equities, bonds, MutualFunds, structured notes and cash among other things. Each factor willpreferably be assigned with a given weight which determines themagnitude of impact of that factor for the optimization process.

The factors which may be considered for the fitness score are:

1. Asset Class Allocation Factor (ACA)—ACA measures how well therecommended portfolio follows a given target portfolio/target stateallocation with respect to Asset Classes.

2. Asset Correlation Factor (AC)—AC measures the correlation of assetswithin a portfolio.

3. Preferred Asset Factor (PA)—PA measures use of preferred assets(premier funds) in the recommended portfolio. This will primarily beutilized for the identification of assets for sale/redemption.

4. Reuse of Existing Assets Factor (REA)—REA measures re-use of theInvestor's existing assets for the new portfolio. The objective is toreduce turn-over of assets in the customer's portfolio and primarilyused to assess whether an asset should be kept within a customer'sportfolio. Frozen assets will be excluded from the calculation.

5. Portfolio Performance Factor (PP)—PP measures performance of theTarget Goal Allocation portfolio. Portfolio Performance along withPortfolio Volatility helps to identify the best possible asset for “Buy”recommendations when more than one asset choices are available.

6. Portfolio Volatility Factor (PV)—PV measures the risk of Goalportfolio. Portfolio Volatility along with Portfolio Performance helpsidentify the best possible asset for “BUY” recommendation when more thanone asset choice is available.

7. Preferred Currency Factor (PC)—PC measures the extent of the TargetGoal Allocation portfolio that complies with the investor's preferencefor the security currency.

8. FX Minimization Factor (FXM)—FXM minimizes the foreign exchange (FX)involved in implementing the recommended portfolio by reducing FXtransactions. It measures for each currency (cash and securitiesdenominated in such currency) in the Target Allocation what percentageof such currency is already in the existing portfolio.

9. Investment Preference Factor (IP)—IP measures the optimization of theportfolio to the customer's preference of “Growth” vs “Income”.

10. Sharpe Ratio Factor (SR)—SR measures the Sharpe Ratio of the TargetGoal Allocation portfolio. The Sharpe ratio is given by the excessreturn divided by the standard deviation. It describes the amount ofexcess return earned from enduring each additional unit of volatility.

The fitness score (FS) is preferably calculated as:

${FS} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}{w_{i}F_{i}}}$

where

-   -   i=1,2, . . . , n    -   F_(i) is the value of the corresponding factor i    -   w_(i) is the corresponding weight of factor i

All factors are scaled from 0.0 to 1.0.

Test Results

The method as hereinbefore described has been tested with 8149 differenttest cases, using 5 different input portfolios. On average, theimprovement of the fitness score was 30%. Testing also included aperformance/response time evaluation. This measures the time fromsending the request through the given application program interface(API) until a response is received electronically. In general, thefindings were that the algorithm runs very fast, even for largeportfolio sizes and a large universe. For the 8149 scenarios tested,over 50% of the responses were obtained within 4 seconds. It was foundthat the fitness of portfolios improves over generations and that thereis a greater dispersion in fitness in portfolios of earlier generations,while portfolios of later generations yield generally high fitness.

The present description illustrates the principles of the presentinvention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the artwill be able to devise various arrangements that, although notexplicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of theinvention and are included within its spirit and scope.

Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, andembodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, areintended to encompass both structural and functional equivalentsthereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include bothcurrently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in thefuture, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function,regardless of structure.

While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in thedrawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered asillustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood thatonly exemplary embodiments have been shown and described and do notlimit the scope of the invention in any manner. It can be appreciatedthat any of the features described herein may be used with anyembodiment. The illustrative embodiments are not exclusive of each otheror of other embodiments not recited herein. Accordingly, the inventionalso provides embodiments that comprise combinations of one or more ofthe illustrative embodiments described above. Modifications andvariations of the invention as herein set forth can be made withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope thereof, and, therefore, only suchlimitations should be imposed as are indicated by the appended claims.

In the claims which follow and in the preceding description of theinvention, except where the context requires otherwise due to expresslanguage or necessary implication, the word “comprise” or variationssuch as “comprises” or “comprising” is used in an inclusive sense, i.e.to specify the presence of the stated features but not to preclude thepresence or addition of further features in various embodiments of theinvention.

It is to be understood that, if any prior art publication is referred toherein, such reference does not constitute an admission that thepublication forms a part of the common general knowledge in the art.

What is claimed:
 1. A computer implemented method for automaticallyselecting a portfolio where said portfolio comprises a population ofsolutions, the method comprising the steps of: generating a plurality offirst generation portfolios from a plurality of available solutions,wherein each of said plurality of first generation portfolios isgenerated by random selection of one or more of said plurality ofavailable solutions; applying a random percentage weighting to each ofsaid randomly selected solutions, but where the sum of the randompercentage weightings is arranged to equal 100%; calculating a score foreach of the plurality of first generation portfolios, the score for eachof said plurality of first generation portfolios of assets comprising anaggregate of a plurality of different evaluation factors; ranking theplurality of first generation portfolios by their respective scores; andselecting a plurality of said first generation portfolios as parentportfolios based on their respective scores and using said parentportfolios to generate a plurality of child portfolios; the methodfurther comprising: calculating a score for each of the plurality ofparent and child portfolios; ranking the plurality of parent and childportfolios by their respective scores; and selecting a subset of saidplurality of parent and child portfolios based on their respectivescores as next generation parent portfolios and using said nextgeneration parent portfolios to generate a plurality of next generationchild portfolios; calculating a score for each of the next generationparent and next generation child portfolios; and repeating the steps ofranking, selecting, generating, and calculating a score for each nextgeneration of portfolios for a plurality of times until a marginalimprovement in a score calculated for a highest ranking portfolio isless than a predetermined amount over a latter pre-set number ofiterations.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein some of the plurality ofparent and/or child portfolios are selected to undergo a mutationprocess whereby, for a selected portfolio, at least one asset of saidportfolio is randomly selected and all or a random percentage weightedportion of said randomly selected asset is replaced by another assetrandomly selected from a union of assets comprising a group of all ofassets of existing portfolios and a group of other eligible assets andwherein the parent and/or child portfolios selected to undergo themutation process are selected by assigning each of said parent and/orchild portfolios with a binary value according to a pre-set mutationrate, where the assigned binary value determines whether a portfolio isselected for the mutation process or not.
 3. The method of claim 2,wherein the solutions comprise assets.
 4. The method of claim 3,comprising the step of receiving data describing an initial portfolio ofassets.
 5. The method of claim 4, comprising the step of making saidinitial portfolio of assets a first one of said plurality of firstgeneration portfolios of assets.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein theplurality of available assets comprises assets comprising said initialportfolio of assets and other eligible assets.
 7. The method of claim 6,wherein a random percentage weighting applied to a randomly selectedasset from said plurality of available assets is limited to a maximumvalue of its percentage weighting in the initial portfolio of assets oris limited to a predetermined maximum percentage weighting where saidasset is one of the other eligible assets.
 8. The method of claim 2,wherein the step of calculating a score for each of the plurality offirst generation portfolios of assets comprises calculating a weightedaggregate of the plurality of different evaluation factors.
 9. Themethod of claim 2, wherein each of the plurality of child portfolios isgenerated by two parent portfolios which are adjacent to each other bytheir ranking scores.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the assets fora child portfolio are randomly selected from a group of assetscomprising the two adjacent parent portfolios.
 11. The method of claim10, wherein a random percentage weighting assigned to a randomlyselected asset from the group of parent assets is limited to a maximumvalue of its original percentage weighting in the respective parentportfolio.
 14. The method of claim 2, comprising the steps of:calculating a score for each of the plurality of parent and childportfolios; ranking the plurality of parent and child portfolios bytheir respective scores; and selecting a subset of said plurality ofparent and child portfolios based on their respective scores as nextgeneration parent portfolios and using said next generation parentportfolios to generate a plurality of next generation child portfolios.15. The method of claim 14, comprising the steps of: generating each ofa plurality of next generation child portfolios from two next generationparent portfolios which are adjacent to each other by their rankingscores; and selecting some of the plurality of next generation parentand/or next generation child portfolios to undergo the mutation process.16. The method of claim 14, comprising the steps of: calculating a scorefor each of the next generation parent and next generation childportfolios.
 17. The method of claim 16, comprising repeating the stepsof ranking, selecting, generating, and calculating a score for each nextgeneration of portfolios for a plurality of times until a marginalimprovement in a score calculated for a highest ranking portfolio isless than a predetermined amount over a latter pre-set number ofiterations.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein said highest rankingportfolio is selected for implementation.
 19. A non-transitory computerreadable medium storing machine readable code which, when executed by aprocessor, causes an electronic processing device to implement the stepsof: generate a plurality of first generation portfolios from a pluralityof available solutions, wherein each of said plurality of firstgeneration portfolios is generated by random selection of one or more ofsaid plurality of available solutions; apply a random percentageweighting to each of said randomly selected solutions, but where the sumof the random percentage weightings is arranged to equal 100%; calculatea score for each of the plurality of first generation portfolios, thescore for each of said plurality of first generation portfolios ofassets comprising an aggregate of a plurality of different evaluationfactors; rank the plurality of first generation portfolios by theirrespective scores; and select a plurality of said first generationportfolios as parent portfolios based on their respective scores andusing said parent portfolios to generate a plurality of childportfolios; the method further comprising: calculate a score for each ofthe plurality of parent and child portfolios; rank the plurality ofparent and child portfolios by their respective scores; and select asubset of said plurality of parent and child portfolios based on theirrespective scores as next generation parent portfolios and using saidnext generation parent portfolios to generate a plurality of nextgeneration child portfolios; calculate a score for each of the nextgeneration parent and next generation child portfolios; and repeat thesteps of ranking, selecting, generating, and calculating a score foreach next generation of portfolios for a plurality of times until amarginal improvement in a score calculated for a highest rankingportfolio is less than a predetermined amount over a latter pre-setnumber of iterations.
 20. A computer based system for automaticallycompiling a portfolio of assets, the system comprising: a computerreadable medium storing machine readable code; and a processorconfigured to execute said machine readable code to: generate aplurality of first generation portfolios from a plurality of availablesolutions, wherein each of said plurality of first generation portfoliosis generated by random selection of one or more of said plurality ofavailable solutions; apply a random percentage weighting to each of saidrandomly selected solutions, but where the sum of the random percentageweightings is arranged to equal 100%; calculate a score for each of theplurality of first generation portfolios, the score for each of saidplurality of first generation portfolios of assets comprising anaggregate of a plurality of different evaluation factors; rank theplurality of first generation portfolios by their respective scores; andselect a plurality of said first generation portfolios as parentportfolios based on their respective scores and using said parentportfolios to generate a plurality of child portfolios; the methodfurther comprising: calculate a score for each of the plurality ofparent and child portfolios; rank the plurality of parent and childportfolios by their respective scores; and select a subset of saidplurality of parent and child portfolios based on their respectivescores as next generation parent portfolios and using said nextgeneration parent portfolios to generate a plurality of next generationchild portfolios; calculate a score for each of the next generationparent and next generation child portfolios; and repeat the steps ofranking, selecting, generating, and calculating a score for each nextgeneration of portfolios for a plurality of times until a marginalimprovement in a score calculated for a highest ranking portfolio isless than a predetermined amount over a latter pre-set number ofiterations.